Big Tech in Northumberland and Railway Rethink?

The ‘Big Tech’ influence on our lives can be quite an interesting one, and an article by Dan Jackson was a good example of what can be ‘pushed’ onto your screen when you happen to awake early on a Sunday morning!

Whlist reading Dan Jackson’s ‘Can Big Tech save Northumberland? Don’t expect a second coal boom‘, I found a lot of common ground within the article; as a Bedlington lad, I too grew up with Blyth Power Station standing tall on the horizon, being clearly visible from my classroom at Meadowdale Middle School during my tenure there, and being a massive landmark of ‘home’ much like the Angel of the North is now for many when returning from a day out, the chimneys being clearly visible from as far as Alnwick Moor, as the A697 started to drop down towards Longframlington after a regular day out with my grandparents in Kelso.

The mention of Bates Colliery is also one close to my heart, it being where my dad began his working career as a joiner and later shaftsman at that pit until it closed in 1986, and in December 2003, I stood with him and my brother as a teenager on the rubble of Bates, and watched those iconic chimneys fall. Even though they’ve been gone from the skyline for over 20 years, they were such a big landmark as to still appear to be ‘missing’ from the skyline.

Sir Daniel Gooch was also a Bedlington lad, born in 1816 when ‘Bedlingtonshire’ was still part of County Durham (it slowly rejoined into Northumberland proper in 1832 and finally in 1844). He had a close family link to the Longridge family, of Bedlington Ironworks fame, which perhaps led him on the path towards being one of the early great railway engineers, though somewhat eclipsed by his colleague, Mr I. K. Brunel.

Daniel Gooch, later Sir Daniel grew up in what is now ‘The Grapes’ pub on Bedlingtons Front Street (one of my frequent haunts at one time), and he is commemorated by a plaque on the front of the pub; another part of Bedlington’s, sadly often forgotton long railway history, which dates back to Huntingdon Beaumont (from Nottinghamshire), who introduced the wooden waggonway to the North East in 1609; which steadily evolved over the next 200 years into the modern railway, with the Bedlington rails developed by John Birkinshaw in 1820 being used heavily on the Stockton and Darlington Railway of 1825, itself celebrating its 200th birthday in the coming days.

The ‘GLO-BED RAIL’ sculpture, signifying Bedlington’s place in railway history

That Sir Daniel Gooch, a railway engineer, and the transatlantic telegraph cable have such a strong connection is not actually as surprising as first thought, as railways and ‘lightspeed communications’ have developed together; the need to safely signal trains, operation of which was becoming ever more complex, and they were travelling increasingly quicker speeds was a driving force in the early telegraph system, with William Fothergill Cooke presenting a design for a mechanical telegraph to the directors of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway in January 1837.

Railways and what we now regard as the internet, have a long parallel history, and in many ways were co-dependent on one another, so for a data centre to be opening in Bedlingtonshire (the area surrounding Bedlington that also includes Cambois) is quite a fitting link to Sir Daniel Gooch overseeing the laying of the transatlantic cable back in 1866.

Bedlingtonshire, and the surrounding areas like Blyth in the nineteenth century, to use a modern phrase, must have been ‘bouncing’; with the Ironworks and later engine building thriving there, coal mines developing rapidly as waggonway technology and later the early railways were built to get coal from new pits to ports for export.

This was a time when many of my own ancestors were relocating to the area around the River Blyth and River Wansbeck for work at the many local pits, coming mostly from rural Northumberland toward the coast near Newcastle, with most members of both sides of my family having been born and lived within a few miles of where I grew up for over 100 years, with almost, if not all, of the male members of my family having employment in the coal industry, I’m the first generation of many in my family to have never worked underground.

Returning to Dan’s piece, the decline of Northumberland and the North East more generally can indeeed be seen from the First World War. Coal production in the UK peaked in 1913, so whilst the industry was still vital for many decades afterwards and well into my own lifetime, with the last deep pit at Ellington closing when I was 14 years old.  After Bates closed, my dad moved to other pits, but eventually left the industry when I was still very young to go self-employed, working very long hours as a builder to make ends meet.

I have many happy memories of going in his Transit to help on jobs as I got old enough to do some useful work, with Magic 1152 playing ‘Baker Street’ to the background of rattling tools, the unmistakable revving of an old Ford diesel engine, and the smells of cement, plaster, and other building materials when travelling to or from different jobs at weekends or during school holidays, but it is a tough way to make a living. Fortunately, he retired from a white collar job, after going to University and studying to change career again while I was still in school myself.

This wider ecomomic decline of the area, when looking back, was clear to see, the once majestic Wallaw cinema in Blyth felt very run-down and tired when I went there to see the first few Harry Potter films before the cinema closed and stood empty for many years ahead of reopening as a quite spectacular Wetherspoons pub. The closure of the ‘Alcan’ smelter at Lynemouth was another major blow, with it being almost the last heavy industry aside from the remaining Lynemouth Power Station, now running on biomass rather than locally mined coal.

As Dan states, the closure of the passenger stations in 1964 dealt another major blow to the area, but one perhaps offset by the then still thriving pits such as Bates, which at the time would have been assumed to be there for decades to come, well past the Millenium (if people even thought that far ahead then) but in the end the clock was ticking much faster – closing and being cleared from the landscape in less than 25 years. The major lines fortunately held on with freight use, still carrying coal until very recently, with the Port of Blyth seeing a complete reversal, and importing coal in recent decades through a new terminal at Battleship Wharf for a few years, with a new railway branch put in as recently as 2006 to handle this traffic where imported coal was blended with local opencast coal and sent to power stations.

If the railway stations had remained open, perhaps south east Northumberland would have made a better transition to other employment opportunities, other industry coming in to replace the lost pits and the power station, itself once proposed for replacement like-for-like by RWE in around 2007, which like the later battery plant, never came to pass despite the optimism that it would, though in hindsight, a new coal power station then would be highly controversial now with the ravages of climate change beginning to be felt.

On a happier note, in 2024 the passenger railway returned with the opening of the Northumberland Line, and while only partially opened so far, has proved to be a huge success, with over half a million passengers thus far in less than a year, with the fourth station at Blyth Bebside due to open in a matter of weeks (Sunday 19th October).

In my view, the Northumberland Coast Loop could very much be a part of revitalising my home area, if Blyth and parts of North Tyneside are now going to be home to multi-billion pound data centres and AI development centres; then maybe we should rethink about the railway is. 

If the railway is ‘just’ going to be a shuttle service from Ashington to Newcastle Central station, with the odd trains to the MetroCentre (as great as that is to see and use), that is fine, it is pretty much what existed before in the days of coal and iron and it is still a massive step forward from where we were just a year ago without a rail connection.

That being said, do we actually think bigger and better, shouldn’t we surely exploit the infrastructure that already exists (the direct Bedlington to Pegswood route), and create a second long-distance route between Newcastle and Edinburgh via Bedlington and Blyth; one that goes through and stops in this part of Northumberland, rather than skirting around the edge of it via Cramlington and Morpeth?

If the cities of Edinburgh and Glasgow can have four different railway routes connecting them together (The Falkirk Line, The North Clyde Line, The Shotts Line, and the Carstairs Line), then surely the cities of Newcastle Upon Tyne and Edinburgh could have the Cramlington Line and the Blyth Line?

The simple question is, if several billion pounds are being invested into data centres, then why not invest a few million more into the railway to make it connect Edinburgh and Newcastle via Blyth and North Tyneside alongside the existing mainline via Cramlington and Morpeth? The multiple lines between Edinburgh and Glasgow give the Scottish Central Belt an economic ‘bounce’, the same could be done in Northumberland and Scottish Borders?

It might not be a ‘silver bullet’ to make the area bounce again, but it could certainly give it a damn good chance?

If you’d like to support the petition, please do so here: https://chng.it/zThXj8HBpY

N.C.L. Petition Update 20.9.25

The petition for a new rail service between Newcastle Upon Tyne, and Edinburgh, via Blyth Bebside, and Northumberland Park continues to grow, and now stands at 944 signatures as of this morning (20.9.25), leaving only 56 signatures to go until the thousand mark is reached!

I would like to give big thank you to all who have signed it so far, and especially to all those who have made a donation via change.org to help promote the petition, with 27 promoters giving a total of £112 so far. Thanks to all of you!

Please keep sharing the petition wide and far, which will keep the proposal in the limelight and hopefully see it at least costed out as a proposal to increase seating capacity on the highly successful Northumberland Line (now at over half a million passengers), as well as providing new, direct connections that have never before been seen by stations in this area of Northumberland.

This new link, using an existing line, could be a massive boost to both residents, as well as local, national, and international businesses located next to Blyth Bebside and Northumberland Park stations (i.e. Dräger Safety in Bebside, and businesses such as Sage, and Newcastle Building Society in the Cobalt Business Park in North Tyneside).

Route map of the Northumberland Coast Loop

More trains running via SE Northumberland would increase the overall number of seats available, as these would be timetabled alongside the existing half-hourly Ashington – Newcastle services, not in place of them; with the added advantage that a direct route north would also potentially release seats too.

This would work by avoiding passengers needing to travel into Newcastle to catch northbound trains, instead passengers could go directly from Northumberland Park/Blyth Bebside into North Northumberland & Scotland, this easing the crowding on Northern Class 158’s by using bi-mode units such as the TPE or LNER 80x fleet, or diesel CrossCountry ‘Voyagers’ to give a service around the ‘Loop’ via Blyth Bebside.

Blyth Bebside Station Opening Soon, and a Sunday Scottish Service?

On Sunday 19th October 2025, the fourth Northumberland Line station, Blyth Bebside, is due to open to passengers, which is great news for the line, which despite only having three of the six stations open at present (Ashington, Newsham, and Seaton Delaval), has carried over 500,000 passengers since the line opened in December 2024.

The two remaining stations at Bedlington, and Northumberland Park will sadly not be expected to open until early 2026.

In other positive news, the Northumberland Line is also due a few service upgrades:

Later trains on the route will start running, allowing more people to travel back from Newcastle in the evening by train.

Direct trains to the MetroCentre will also run on Sundays only.

The steady completion of stations on the route is most welcome, as is the addition of arguably ‘better’ services by them running daily into much later evenings, as well as a new direct route to the MetroCentre on a Sunday.

The huge passenger figures for the line show what a great investment the line has turned out to be, and how it was long overdue taking place, hopefully further expansions to the line will happen far sooner!

Problems of being popular!

On social media, there have been some concerns raised about the crowding on trains due to short two-car Class 158 multiple units being used, and that with the opening of Blyth Bebside, this problem may become worse, as more stations opening will add more passengers into already quite crowded trains.

In many ways, the crowding of the trains is a sign of how popular the line is proving to be, but it is a victim of its own success with the ageing Class 156 & Class 158 DMU’s unable to cope with peak demands.

Hitachi 80x fleet via Blyth?

One solution to this might be to use the proposed Northumberland Coast Loop route (Newcastle to Bedlington, then Pegswood, Berwick-Upon-Tweed, and on to Edinburgh) and using bi-mode trains such as the LNER/TPE 80x fleet to augment the Newcastle – Ashington diesel trains.

Route map showing the Northumberland Coast Loop
TPE bi-mode at Alnmouth, something that could be seen at Blyth Bebside and other Northumberland Line stations?

Being bi-mode trains, the lack of wires on the Northumberland Line wouldn’t present a problem, as the trains have an on-board diesel engine to cope with unwired routes. The training of more drivers over this potentially important diversionary route would give more operational flexibility for trains to keep running in event of a line closure between Benton Junction and Morpeth, with damage to Plessey Viaduct in October 2023 a good example of the potential use of the line.

Even if calling at just some stations, the additional seats provided by running extra trains via the Loop would ease the crowding on other services, whilst also creating a new northward connection to North Northumberland and into Scotland, something that the area has never seen, but would almost undoubtedly prove popular, with Scotland and the borders being a popular destination from SE Northumberland. 

Sunday Services to Scotland?

Perhaps a good way to trial this might be a Sunday service, similar to the MetroCentre one, allowing people to take a day out in North Northumberland or Scotland on a Sunday? Longer term, it is potentially a route that could run 7 days a week, 364 days a year (no trains on Christmas Day typically), but a Sunday service, similar to the Ashington – MetroCentre service would be a great start!

Indeed, the petition for such a service now stands at over 920 signatures, and using the loop route would also help to build a case for a seventh station at Choppington too, a station that could serve a large part of Bedlington, Choppington, Guide Post, and Stakeford.

If you would like to see a Newcastle – Blyth – Berwick – Edinburgh rail service, please support the petition here: https://chng.it/zThXj8HBpY

Thanks, RH.

CRAG campaign calls for better coastal connectivity via Chathill, and thoughts on wider Northumberland Coast Rail Services

On Thursday 4th September 2025, David Smith, MP for North Northumberland, Deputy Mayor Cllr Martin Gannon, and local County Councillor Guy Renner-Thompson attended a meeting organised by the Chathill Rail Action Group (CRAG) at Chathill Station to discuss the improvement of rail services to and from this underserved station on the North Northumberland Coast.

As can be seen from the above Facebook post by CRAG, this meeting was supported by a further 80-90 persons, interested in the campaign to have more trains calling at this station on the busy East Coast Main Line (ECML); which sees 140 trains a day pass through it at speed, but only the twice daily ‘Chathill Flyer’ actually stops there; giving the station just two trains in each direction per day, and then only to/from Newcastle, it isn’t currently possible to head north to Berwick or any other station from Chathill directly.

Rail travel, and connecting buses the solution to seaside traffic trouble?

Tourism: A double-edged sword?

Articles such as the one above from The Chronicle highlight the problem of Northumberland’s reliance on car-based tourism; villages and towns are becoming overwhelmed by cars. With a limited range of public transport options, most visitors drive to these beautiful seaside villages such as Seahouses and Bamburgh, but the congestion, only added to year on year by more visitors coming, is arguably spoiling their rural charm and character, with the same problem being played out more widely across Northumberland as a whole: the tourism industry brings much needed income and jobs to the area, but road traffic is a major problem.

In the words of the well known song ‘Big Yellow Taxi’ by Counting Crows:

Don’t it always seem to go
That you don’t know what you got ’til it’s gone?
They paved paradise and put up a parking lot

The above quote is pertinent as Northumberland faces some very stark choices with the growth of tourism, do you ‘pave over paradise’ through schemes such as dualling the A1, building ever increasing numbers of car parks to accomodate more and larger cars that put even more traffic through towns that already can’t cope, or do you invest in rail and buses and part of a co-ordinated public transport service, to ger the tourists to the attractions witbout their cars in the first place?

Lifeline for locals too

On a smaller scale, but no less important is the needs of local people to access education, training, and employment beyond their hometowns, without necessitating the need to relocate for this, or be dependent upon being able to drive to access these things, which is prohibitively expensive for young people, and excludes those who may be unable to drive due to disability or for health reasons.

BBC article about the same meeting at Chathill Station

Chathill is just one of several existing and new stations needing a real rail service

All of the stations between Newcastle and Edinburgh could do with more services; ranging from the ‘big’ stations of Berwick, Alnmouth, and Morpeth, down to the smaller ones of Chathill, Acklington, Widdrington, and Pegswood, the latter one also being highlighted by local County County Councillor Vicky Oakley in a recent Facebook post (see below).

Recent Facebook post from Cllr Vicky Oakley, Pegswood Ward

A twice daily train is arguably not a real rail service, in terms that it is of such a low frequency that is is of limited benefit to its users, and results in these stations having such a low annual usage to be amongst the least used in the whole of the UK, despite being an an area that is thriving with tourism, Seahouses has 500,000 visitors a year, yet very few of that number will travel there by rail at all, despite Chathill being on the mainline between Edinburgh, Newcastle, York, and London, and just a short bus ride from Chathill to Seahouses itself.

Problems and Solutions

Constrained Capacity and Tired Trains

With 140 trains using the double track East Coast Main Line each day, finding a ‘path’ (a timetable slot) for a train to slow down, stop, pick-up/drop-off passengers, then accelerate away again is challenging, especially with the use of ageing Class 156 and Class 158 diesel trains built by British Rail in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, all of these being over 30 years old and approaching the end of their useful lifespan.

Northumberland Needs Electric Trains

Part of the solution is to replace these ageing diesel trains with 100% electric trains, or battery/electric bi-mode units which are capable of far better performance in acceleration and braking, and would be better able to mix amongst the faster, non-stop or few stop (semi-fast) services sharing the ECML.

A good contender for the Newcastle – Edinburgh route could be the Hitachi built Class 385 electric units, which are in regular use with ScotRail between Glasgow and Edinburgh already, and have a capacity (depending on if they are 3-car or 4-car sets of 206 or 273 seats (the latter a mix of 20 First Class and 253 Standard)), though this would need procurement via an operator such as ScotlRail or Northern, whichever was to begin the service.

Using an existing, proven design that is already in use nearby would give an opportunity to see a fleet expansion, with an already skilled workforce in operating and maintaining the units available as new trains are delivered to provide Newcastle – Edinburgh local train service. In comparison, a totally new fleet would require a much wider training and knowledge gain for the workforce, and may have teething issues such as that seen with the Tyne and Wear Metro units, something which has already been sorted on the Class 385’s to my knowledge.

Two Track Line with Passing Places

Another is factor is the largely two track nature of the line, which means that a slow train, stopping at lots of stations such as Chathill is caught up by faster trains running behind it.

In the article, Cllr Gannon suggests four-tracking of the line between Newcastle and Edinburgh would be the ideal, but this would be prohibitively expensive; imagine the costs and disruption of putting two extra tracks through Berwick for example; and getting over the Tweed potentially on a new bridge adjacent to the iconic Royal Border Bridge would pose substantial, but not insurmountable challenges.

Example: Relocate Alnmouth Station?

That being said, a more effective solution is to use both existing, and new passing places to allow stopping trains to be overtaken by faster ones behind.

Indeed the existing ‘Chathill Flyer’ (train 2N09) does this after its call at Alnmouth heading south towards Newcastle, sitting in the loop at Wooden Gate for 13 minutes (from 07:22½ to 07:35½) to allow for a passing train.

Timetable for the morning southbound ‘Chathill Flyer’ on 8.9.25

It may prove beneficial to build new platforms adjacent to these loops at Wooden Gate, and perhaps even relocate Alnmouth Station entirely to this new location, meaning that any stopped train can be overtaken by one following behind, which could permit more trains to stop at Alnmouth station, meaning a better rail service as a result: a win-win if ever there was one?

If looped stops are longer anyway (as the ‘Flyer’ is timetabled for 13 minutes in the loop at Wooden), then it could be a more appropriate place for disabled passengers or those needing additional time to board.

This could be coupled with direct access to/from the A1068, meaning better access as a ‘Parkway’ station, but also an easier route for rail/bus integration at Alnmouth for connections to the popular towns of Alnwick and Amble.

Please also take a look at the campaign for better buses between Alnwick, Alnmouth Railway Station, and Amble here: https://chng.it/B4RwwtHnJc

The existing but somewhat utilitarian Alnmouth station as of 2025.

As a station that somewhat sadly lost its heritage buildings many years ago, relocating Alnmouth station would offer an opportunity for a new-build station that is better than the current one, and could make use of the great view over the Aln Estuary and the picturesque village of Alnmouth itself

Catching the southbound ‘Chathill Flyer’ earlier in 2025.
Sitting aboard 158796 in Wooden Gate Loops, in what perhaps could be the location for a new ‘Alnmouth’ station?

There are similar loops in other locations along the ECML, those at Belford for example would be ideally placed to build a new station adjacent to the loop lines, allowing stopping trains to serve the area around Belford, and allowing faster trains to overtake, again a huge win-win, and for the relatively modest cost of about £20m (the approximate cost of a new railway station on a mainline).

Therefore a rebuild of Alnmouth, and a new station entirely at Belford, both on loop lines to allow other trains to overtake could be potentially achieved for approx £40m in total, a fraction of the expected cost of alterations to Moor Farm, and Seaton Burn Junctions on the A19 (£300m to £775m depending on option selected), or dualling of the A1 (£500m+), and rail schemes typically have a far greater economic return too, so again a huge potential win-win.

Northumberland Coast Loop

Another factor which would be worth investigation would be the route using the Northumberland Coast Loop, which in the northbound direction comes off the ECML at Benton Junction, and runs up the Northumberland Line as far as Bedlington, before cutting back to the ECML via Hepscott, and rejoining the route to Scotland at Morpeth North Junction.

The line towards Scotland from Bedlington
Morpeth North Curve looking towards Scotland
Route map of the Northumberland Coast Loop

As can be seen from the route map above, a train making its way via the ‘loop’, calling at Northumberland Park, and Blyth Bebside (for the proposed semi-fast service), or at all five stations (N’land Park, Seaton Delaval, Newsham, Blyth Bebside, and Bedlington) for a local service, would be clear of the ECML between Benton Junction and Morpeth North, effectively forming a very long passing loop in each direction, meaning that faster trains behind could run through, or call at Cramlington, and/or Morpeth and still overtake the train taking the loop route via Blyth.

This is much like a bus route such as the X15 coming off the A1 to drive through Felton to pick-up/drop-off passengers close to their home or destination, and allowing other traffic to overtake the bus, as opposed to pulling in at the roadside and slowing down/stopping following vehicles and staying on the A1 throughout.

A rail route via Blyth is a slightly slower one than sticking solely to the ECML, but has the key advantage that catching the train at a Blyth station (Blyth Bebside is perhaps the better overall location) is more convenient for people living in/close to Blyth, or where rail services from Ashington (and in the future Woodhorn/Newbiggin) will pass through, compared to Morpeth, which, especially by public transport can be awkward/long-winded to reach from these towns.

If you’d like to support the petition for a rail service via Blyth, please visit the petition page here: https://chng.it/zThXj8HBpY

Trains to the seaside: MASSIVE potential for the Northumberland Coast by rail

A recent article in the Independent newspaper, titled ‘The UK coastal areas daytrippers are flocking to via train‘ shows the potential importance of better rail services along the Northumberland Coast, and in particular the potential of the Northumberland Coast Loop route, which would form a direct rail link between Blyth and Berwick-Upon-Tweed.

Screenshot of the Independent article

In this article, it is anticipated that a contribution of £916m will be made to local economies around Britain where passengers are travelling by rail during the summer holiday period. Should Northumberland be better placed to capture even a fraction of this, it would be a transformative volume of investment into the local economy.

In the more detailed version of this article,the data from the Rail Delivery Group (RDG) suggests that almost half (47%) of trips are from within the same region, for example a family from Blyth might travel to Berwick for a day-out, or vice versa, and would spend money both in their ‘home’ area, as well as at the destination.

Overall, across the UK, this is expected to be around £678m in the ‘home’ area, with £916m in the destination area.

This is perhaps an opportunity that is too good to miss for Northumberland?

The Borders Railway is nearly 10!

On Saturday 6th September 2025, the Borders Railway will celebrate a decade of operating from Tweedbank to Edinburgh, with the line opening to passengers on 6th September 2015, and official opening by the late Queen Elizabeth II a few days later on 9th September that year. Well done to all involved in that campaign to get it built, and the success of which proved the potential for other, similarly successful reopenings such as the Northumberland Line between Ashington and Newcastle-Upon-Tyne.

Edinburgh to Tweedbank, for now…

This railway was once a through route between Edinburgh and Carlisle, formerly referred to as ‘The Waverley Route’, and which the Campaign for Borders Rail has long been championing the rebuilding of the route fully to reconnect Edinburgh and Carlisle once again by rail via Hawick.

If you can, please give the campaign any support you are able to!

The Northumberland Coast Loop; ready to go?

In comparison to the Borders Railway, which needs many miles of track relaid beyond the current terminus at Tweedbank towards Carlisle; the Northumberland Coast Loop could be able to offer a Newcastle-Upon-Tyne to Edinburgh via Blyth connection, by using the existing, direct link between Bedlington and Pegswood, as shown on the map below.

This would give areas in SE Northumberland a much better range of connections northwards, much as a fully extended Borders Railway would offer a better range connections to and from Carlisle and the south more broadly.

Do both is the answer here; using rail as a backbone of public transport for long distances, and get more direct connections between places established, making them quicker and as convenient as possible.

The Borders Railway is one that I would love to see once again reconnect Edinburgh and Carlisle, but the Northumberland Coast Loop could also form a new connection, using a line that has never fully closed, to offer new connections between Newcastle and Edinburgh, and could potentially do so very quickly.

If you’d like to support our petition for the Northumberland Coast Loop route between Newcastle and Edinburgh via Blyth, Northumberland, please click the link here: https://chng.it/zThXj8HBpY

CRAG Meeting: Thursday 4th September at Chathill Station

The Chathill Rail Action Group (CRAG) is hosting a meeting (as outlined in the screenshot from their Facebook page below), at Chathill Station, Northumberland on Thursday 4th September.

In attendance will be; David Smith, MP for North Northumberland, Deputy Mayor Cllr Martin Gannon, and local County Councilor Guy Renner-Thompson, with free buses by Borders Buses also running to and from the station from Bamburgh. 

CRAG is an independent organisation from the Northumberland Coast Loop, but one which hopefully we can continue to work alongside constructively to improve rail services in Northumberland as a whole, as well as Chathill more specifically. 

Unfortunately due to work commitments, myself as the representative for the Northumberland Coast Loop won’t be able to attend this event.

Northumberland Coast Loop: end of August 25 Update

Today, Sunday 31st August 2025 marks the end of Summer and the beginning of Autumn, but with some significant progress being made on our campaign for the Northumberland Coast Loop, a new rail service between Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, England, and Edinburgh, Scotland via Blyth, Northumberland.

Petition Progress Continues

The current petition for a semi-fast service between Newcastle and Edinburgh via Blyth has continued to make great progress with 925 signatures as of this morning. This petition could well reach a thousand or more by the time of the opening of the next Northumberland Line station, forecast to be Blyth Bebside, which is now expected to open in October. The final stations of Bedlington, and Northumberland Park are due to open in ‘early 2026’, sadly lagging well behind the stations at Ashington, and Seaton Delaval which will celebrate their first anniversary since opening on 15th December 2025.

Hopefully all six stations will be fully completed by Spring 2026, and thoughts can then be more focussed on running this new rail service via Blyth?

I would like to wish a massive thank you to all who have signed and supported this petition so far, but please keep sharing with friends and family to keep it making progress!

Reopening Belford Railway Station a better option than A1 Dualling in Northumberland?

Dual the A1 for £500m+?

A recent article from the Northumberland Gazette has stated that Cllr Guy Renner-Thompson, of the Bamburgh Ward in Northumberland is calling for the Development Consent Order (DCO) for dualling the A1 further between Morpeth and Ellingham to be retained by Secretary of State for Transport, Heidi Alexander, MP.

Dualling will bring more danger to local roads.

Dualling of the A1 would, however, bring the considerable downsides of increased volumes of traffic both on the A1 itself (overwhelming other stretches of the road), and in places like his own ward of Bamburgh, road traffic is already a significant safety issue, with the campaign for a safer road crossing in Bamburgh gaining increasing traction, and with venues such as Bamburgh Castle attracting around 150,000 visitors a year, it brings a lot of vehicles into the historic village, making the roads busy and increasingly risky for visitors trying to enjoy the village.

Rail investment is an answer to both; get people to Belford, Bamburgh, and the surrounding area WITHOUT cars, for a fraction of the price?

There could be a solution, and a comparatively low cost one at that, which might have been overlooked; the rebuilding and reopening of Belford Railway Station.

In the above article, Cllr Thompson himself states that “Hundreds of thousands of tourists visit north Northumberland each year and a station at Belford would be in the epicentre of the tourist trade.“, so if the A1 is highly unlikely to be built in the coming years, why not get Belford Station rebuilt and opened to passengers instead?

If it is assumed that Belford railway station would cost in the ballpark of £20m (minimum of £14m in Novemeber 2024), then 25 railway stations could be delivered for the cost of dualling just 13 miles of road

This figure is borne out by the recent opening and ongoing construction of the Northumberland Line, with 18 miles of freight line reopened to passengers, as well as six new stations expected to cost £298.5m so far, plus an extra £37.9m needed towards completion coming at a grand total of £336.4m, which is still £163.6m less than the expected cost of dualling the A1 between Morpeth and Ellingham.

For the comparatively small sum of £20m (compared to £500m+ price of dualling the A1), surely getting Belford Station rebuilt would represent a better investment for Northumberland.

As also hinted at in the article, the opening of railfreight facilities at Belford could also help to reduce HGV movements on the A1, cutting carbon emissions and reducing traffic on the A1 too.

Lets hope that Belford could be reopened far faster than 2036; two platforms adjacent to an existing passenger railway should not need a decade to be built, lets hope that 2030, or even earlier could be possible.

Railtour in Retrospect: 1Z84  Dunbarton to Newcastle 25.8.25

The Royal Edinburgh Military Tattoo and Waverley Weekender‘, a railtour organised by UK Railtours, and operated by the West Coast Railway Company had a section the return leg of the trip from Dunbarton, Scotland to Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, England due to travel over the proposed Northumberland Coast Loop route today (Monday 25th August 2025).

The original plan…

The tour was originally planned to run from Dunbarton to Edinburgh, then run south along the East Coast Main Line (ECML), but at Morpeth North Junction, the train would then leave the ECML, and run along the presently rarely passenger worked section to Bedlington Station on the Northumberland Line; it then continuing towards Newcastle Central via the under-construction and open stations at Blyth Bebside, Newsham, Seaton Delaval, and Northumberland Park.

With an aim to taking photos/videos of this service, I travelled from my ‘home’ station at Alnmouth to Morpeth (in very glorious weather!) aboard the 10:47 TPE service 9N09, as operated by 802213, the aim being to ‘catch’ the railtour on the rarely passenger worked Morpeth North Curve, though sadly this didn’t work out on the day.

Glorious weather at Alnmouth
TPE 802213 arrives at Alnmouth
After arrival at Morpeth, making my way to Morpeth North Curve and seeing 802213 departing towards Newcastle

The departure from Alnmouth and arrival at Morpeth was two minutes late (11:02 rather than 11:00 exactly) but this allowed more than ample time to walk to my destination as the railtour was booked at Morpeth North Junction for 12:02, reaching Hepscott Junction at 12:04, so still almost an hour ahead of the scheduled arrival time.

A short walk along Coopies Lane, Coopies Lane, and then onto Coopies Haugh brought me to the end of a footpath (w3w ///processes.unwound.barn), which leads to a foot crossing (w3w ///plea.refuses.shepherdess) over the Morpeth North Curve where I intended to view 1Z84 from at a safe distance on the approaches to this crossing.

Concrete style towards the foot crossing
The crossing looking towards the ECML
The crossing itself from the western side of the line looking towards Coopies Haugh and Coopies Way
The line towards Bedlington, Blyth and Newcastle via the Coastal route

… but unexpected problems lead to a late running railtour!

Once at the above foot crossing, the data from the excellent Realtime Trains website showed that things were going awry with the railtour, with information beginning to trickle through that the railtour was beginning to get delayed, and then more substantially so quickly.

It started well…
…but things started going wrong up in Scotland.

With my train back booked for 12:54 aboard the LNER service back to Alnmouth, and a family event to attend, I made my way back to the station via Clarks Bog, a nature reserve adjacent to the Morpeth North Curve, and over the bridge that takes Coopies Lane over the line (w3w ///encloses.stowing.loosens)

Looking towards the ECML from Coopies Lane
Towards Bedlington from Coopies Lane
Storage24 is nestled in the triangular space between the Morpeth North Curve, the ECML and Coopies Lane at Morpeth.
Part of the lineside features on the ECML heading back towards Morpeth Station
Footbridge over the ECML near Morpeth, looking northbound.

Looking southbound at the same footbridge.
Construction work in the Network Rail compound at Morpeth.
Morpeth Signalbox
Morpeth Station after some quick refreshments at the cafe, and a shoutout to the lovely staff within!
Plenty of passengers waiting to board the 2A28 towards Carlisle worked by 156475
A now well loaded 156 waiting to head off to Carlisle as 2A28
My return train, the two minute late 12:54 LNER service towards Alnmouth
Another well filled service (I chose to stand due to well filled seats), with many disemarking at Alnmouth, arriving back at 13:09.

With the now heavily delayed 1Z84 now expected to pass Alnmouth around 13:30, I decided to simply catch it there instead.

WCRC Class 47 roars through Alnmouth with the then 109min late railtour.

The cause of the delay is at present unclear, with some rumour than the locomotives on the railtour suffered issues, but also other trains in the area having traction problems, but by the time the railtour reached Morpeth North Junction, it was by the 118 minutes behind schedule. The decision was presumably taken by signallers to avoid going via Bedlington, and to make up time by going via Morpeth and Cramlington instead.

Late running of 1Z84 caught up by avoiding Bedlington and running via Morpeth and Cramlington.

The change of route allowed the recovery of 26 minutes, with the delay falling from 118 minutes late to 92 minutes late, with expected timetable for the route via Bedlington from Morpeth North Junction (12:02) to Benton North Junction (12:45½) expected to take 43½ minutes overall, compared to the 17½ of the route via Morpeth and Cramlington for this train (running at max of 95mph with a c.450ton trailing load).

Conclusions

Whilst the problems encountered meant that unfortunately the railtour didn’t actually run via Bedlington today, the planned timetable does offer some useful information for the proposed regular passenger service via this route (Newcastle – Bedlington – Edinburgh and vice versa).

30 minutes or less to go via Bedlington vs via Cramlington

The 26 minute difference in the route timings between Morpeth North Junction and Benton North Junction for example, demonstrates that the route is not an unduly long detour, with modern rolling stock such as the TPE 80x fleet allowing higher train performance, and potential to upgrade line speeds on the Morpeth North Junction to Bedlington Junction section, the running times over this loop, inclusive of stops might be capable of remaining below 30 minutes of additional time compared to the current route via Cramlington, and Morpeth stations.

Driver Knowledge and Route Resilience

In addition, the last minute change of route to run via Cramlington rather than Bedlington, in this case simply to make up lost time, shows the benefits of the driver knowing both routes; had the driver lacked the route knowledge of running via Cramlington, the train would have been restricted to the slower route, or might have been further delayed to await another driver or a route conductor to take the train over the alternative route.

In the event of a much larger problem, as demonstrated by the structural issues with Plessey Viaduct in October 2023, the knowledge of an alternative route could be invaluable, especially if a ‘normal’ route was to be closed for a substantial time (Plessey Viaduct could have been a total closure had damage been more extensive for example).

The use of electric only trains would be problematic due to the absence of wiring ‘on the loop’ at present, but a lot of rolling stock is still diesel or bi-modal, so the lack of wiring would not itself present an issue.

The main challenges would be rolling stock clearance and driver knowledge, but both of these problems could be resolved by routine running; stock clearance would be reasonable to ensure for a regularly run route, and driver knowledge would be gained and retained by using the route routinely for passenger services.

Economic gains

The major justification for a rail service via the Northumberland Coast Loop is the potential economic gain for towns such as Bedlington and Blyth, as well as wider areas such as North Tyneside from the provision of direct rail services to as many places as possible.

It is well known that communities which are better connected by rail tend to thrive economically, Morpeth for example does very well from the wide range of services that call there, with great links to Newcastle, Edinburgh, and Carlisle, as well as many other towns and cities, but shouldn’t far larger towns on the Northumberland Line also see a similar range of destinations become available, even if operated at a lower frequency?

If you agree, please sign the petition here: https://chng.it/zThXj8HBpYhttps://chng.it/zThXj8HBpY